ReviewPulmonary therapy2025
Epidemiology and Prognosis of Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Literature Review.
Review in Pulmonary therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occurrence of progressive pulmonary fibrosis and its association with survival in connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease: an international retrospective cohort study.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Multi-omics insights into the mechanisms and prognosis of IPF.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2026Review
- Liuweidihuang Pill Attenuates Early Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis in Mice and Is Associated with Gut Microbiome.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Pulmonary Function Decline in Very Early Diagnosis of Systemic Sclerosis: A Retrospective Longitudinal Single-Center Study.ACR open rheumatology · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Pirfenidone in Patients with Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Disease burden of interstitial lung disease and pulmonary sarcoidosis from 1992 to 2021 and prediction of future disease burden trend in China.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The spectrum of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) includes a wide range of clinical entities with variable disease courses and prognoses. Several ILDs other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) may exhibit a progressive fibrotic phenotype, with diverse clinical presentation, histopathological and radiological patterns, as well as varying rates of disease progression and uncertain epidemiology, but with a similar prognosis of untreated idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with irreversible lung function deterioration, substantial worsening of quality of life and early mortality. The recently defined term "progressive pulmonary fibrosis" (PPF) stands as an opportunity to better classify patients with progressive fibrotic disease and other IPF, irrespective of the underlying ILD. The definition of disease progression, including factors such as pulmonary function test decline, radiological progression, and symptomatic worsening, was not adopted until recently, thus significantly impacting the certainty of current estimates of incidence and prevalence and prognostic outcomes. Understanding disease progression in the broad spectrum of potentially progressive ILDs is key for developing standardized management algorithms irrespective of the ILD diagnosis. Current evidence points towards the potential beneficial effect of antifibrotic drugs in lung function decline and overall outcomes in several non-IPF progressive ILDs showing progression despite optimal management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.