ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Estimating the Replicability of Sports and Exercise Science Research.
Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Two-Way Ballistic Versus Jump Squat Training on Explosive Strength and Neuromuscular Adaptations in Highly Trained Sprinters.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2026Trial
- Effect of Consecutive Jumping Trials on Metatarsophalangeal, Ankle, Knee and Hip Biomechanics During Take-Off and Landing: A Replication and Extension Study.European journal of sport science · 2026Article
- Mental Toughness and 2K Rowing Performance in Division II Female Collegiate Athletes: A Longitudinal Analysis Using Mixed-Effects Modeling.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A journal article reporting standard working group in sport and exercise science: a call to action.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Method-dependent differences in VO₂ peak determination and their implications for percentage-based exercise prescription in elite rowers.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Unifying to Advance Understanding: Collaborative, Community-Driven and 'Open' Approaches for Better Science in Sport.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Comparative Effects of an Acute Bout of Self-Myofascial Release on the Plantar Fascia Using AuramatHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Stronger hearts, weaker leaps? The cardiac power paradox in elite soccer.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- The Untapped Potential of Expert Elicitation in Sports Medicine Epidemiology.Sports medicine - open · 2026Article
- Work-to-rest ratios in repeated sprint assessments: A replication study.Sports medicine international open · 2026Article
- A pilot self-coach alignment audit in NCAA collegiate rowers: field feasibility, null findings, and design-sensitivity analysis for future self-verification research.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Beyond hypertrophy: a network physiology perspective on the cardio-neuromuscular trade-off in elite soccer.Frontiers in network physiology · 2026Article
- To adjust or not to adjust? Matching statistical choices to scientific questions in exercise physiology and sport science.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Toward a paradox-oriented paradigm of knowing: the form theory of observation and quality in empirical sciences.Frontiers in sociology · 2026Review
- Fit one model, report one number: how to analyse a training or intervention study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Beyond theSports medicine international open · 2026Article
- Translational Lifestyle Medicine Approaches to Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Exercise in CKM syndrome progression: a stage-specific approach to cardiovascular, metabolic, and renal health.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Review
- Handgrip Strength Asymmetry in Female Basketball Players: The Critical Role of Arm Position and the Challenge of Statistical Power.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
101 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe replicability of sports and exercise research has not been assessed previously despite concerns about scientific practices within the field.
aimThis study aims to provide an initial estimate of the replicability of applied sports and exercise science research published in quartile 1 journals (SCImago journal ranking for 2019 in the Sports Science subject category; www.scimagojr.com ) between 2016 and 2021.
methodsA formalised selection protocol for this replication project was previously published. Voluntary collaborators were recruited, and studies were allocated in a stratified and randomised manner on the basis of equipment and expertise. Original authors were contacted to provide deidentified raw data, to review preregistrations and to provide methodological clarifications. A multiple inferential strategy was employed to analyse the replication data. The same analysis (i.e. F test or t test) was used to determine whether the replication effect size was statistically significant and in the same direction as the original effect size. Z-tests were used to determine whether the original and replication effect size estimates were compatible or significantly different in magnitude.
resultsIn total, 25 replication studies were included for analysis. Of the 25, 10 replications used paired t tests, 1 used an independent t test and 14 used an analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the statistical analyses. In all, 7 (28%) studies demonstrated robust replicability, meeting all three validation criteria: achieving statistical significance (p < 0.05) in the same direction as the original study and showing compatible effect size magnitudes as per the Z test (p > 0.05).
conclusionThere was a substantial decrease in the published effect size estimate magnitudes when replicated; therefore, sports and exercise science researchers should consider effect size uncertainty when conducting subsequent power analyses. Additionally, there were many barriers to conducting the replication studies, e.g., original author communication and poor data and reporting transparency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.