ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
Uncovering the impact of randomness in HIV hotspot formation: A mathematical modeling study.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHIV hotspots, regions with higher prevalence than surrounding areas, are observed across Africa, yet their formation and persistence mechanisms remain poorly understood. We hypothesized that random fluctuations during the early stages of the HIV epidemic (1978-1982), amplified by positive feedback between HIV incidence and prevalence, play a critical role in hotspot formation and persistence. To explore this, we applied a network-based HIV transmission model, focusing on randomness in the spatial structure of the epidemic.
methodsWe adapted a previously validated agent-based network HIV transmission model, EMOD-HIV, to simulate HIV spread in western Kenya communities. The model includes demographics, age-structured social networks, and HIV transmission, prevention, and treatment. We simulated 250 identical communities, introducing stochastic fluctuations in network structure and case importation. Outliers were defined as communities with prevalence > 1.5x the median, and persistence as meeting these criteria for >70% of 1980-2050. We systematically varied community size (1,000-10,000), importation timing (1978-1982), and importation patterns (spread over 1, 3, or 5 years), and calculated the proportion of outliers and persistent outliers.
resultsHIV prevalence outliers were more common in smaller communities: in 1990, 25.3% (uncertainty interval: 22.3%-28.2%) of 1,000-person communities vs. 9.1% (uncertainty interval: 6.9%-11.4%) of 10,000-person communities. By 2050, 21.6% of 1,000-person communities were persistent outliers, compared to none in larger communities. Autocorrelation of HIV prevalence was high (Pearson's correlation coefficient 0.801 [95% CI: 0.796-0.806] for 1,000-person communities), reflecting feedback that amplified early fluctuations.
conclusionsEarly random fluctuations contribute to the emergence and persistence of prevalence outliers, especially in smaller communities. Recognizing the role of randomness in prevalence outlier formation in these settings is crucial for refining HIV control strategies, as traditional methods may overlook these areas. Adaptive surveillance systems can enhance detection and intervention efforts for HIV and future pandemics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.