ArticleJMIR nursing2025
Effect of Digital Tools on the Knowledge and Performance of Frontline Health Workers For Diabetes Control in Myanmar: Cost-Effective Analysis and Quasi Experimental Study.
Article in JMIR nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetes has become a significant global health issue, particularly imposing a deep economic burden on low-income countries. Innovative and integrated digital solutions can reduce the impact of diabetes and enhance the quality of care. However, digital solutions have not been utilized before in Myanmar. Objective: This study aimed to demonstrate the novel integrated effect of diabetes knowledge and registry tools on the performance of front-line health workers in primary health care settings. Methods: A quasi-experimental study with an intervention and a control group was conducted in two townships from October 2022 to April 2023. For the first time, researchers trained the intervention group to use digital tools for diabetes control and performed monthly follow-ups. The study employed multiple linear regression models to explore the novel impact of digital tools on knowledge and performance scores, their correlations, and their association with covariates. Additionally, it assessed the cost-effectiveness of the intervention by using self-administered questionnaires as measurement tools formulated based on the National Diabetes Guidelines. Results: A total of 96 participants were enrolled in the study, divided evenly into the two groups. The intervention group exhibited a significant increase in the mean knowledge scores from 85.81 to 99.25 (P<.001) and performance scores from 71.22 to 107.16 (P<.001). The intervention accounted for 43.2% of the variance in knowledge scores and 62.5% in performance scores (P<.001). A positive correlation was found between knowledge and performance scores (r=0.45, P<.001). The intervention was also cost-effective, with a cost-effectiveness analysis value of 0.711 and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 10127.04 Kyats (US$ 4.83). Conclusions: As the new integrated intervention yields significant economic gains and positive effects, researchers suggest policy makers replicate this intervention as a nationwide program and recommend scaling up the use of digital tools to improve knowledge and performance for diabetes control in frontline health workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.