ReviewNature reviews. Nephrology2025
Nephrogenomics, precision medicine and the role of genetic testing in adult kidney disease management.
Review in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends in awareness and uptake of genetic testing among the United States population, 2011-2022.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- 'Missing' disease-causing variants in Alport syndrome.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026Review
- Operational checks for real-time urinary biomarker measurements for assessment of the quality of deceased donor kidneys.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Developmental Programming of Kidney Disease Across the Life Course: A Narrative Review Focused on Inflammation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Gut microbial-derived metabolites: key players in kidney disease and renal fibrosis.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Review
- From immune dysregulation to renal injury: mechanistic insights and translational opportunities in immune-mediated nephropathies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- From tradition to transformation: evolving models of care in clinical genetics.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Genetic Kidney Disease Across the Lifespan - Emerging Insights From Clinical Genomics in Older People.Kidney international reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetic investigations in nephrology have long been viewed as the prerogative of paediatricians or restricted to archetypal genetic nephropathies with highly penetrant variants affecting young adults. However, genetic testing has emerged as a pivotal tool in the field of adult nephrology, with the ability to revolutionize the understanding and management of adult kidney diseases. Here, we explore the multifaceted role of genomic testing (such as exome or genome sequencing) in chronic kidney disease, shedding light on current genetic findings for reframing diagnostic paradigms and tailoring treatment strategies. Genomic testing has enhanced our comprehension of kidney diseases of unknown origin by showing that ~20% are attributable to kidney Mendelian genetic disorders with as yet unsuspected phenocopies. Beyond genetic counselling, genetic integration can optimize therapeutic interventions, kidney transplantation and kidney disease prevention, both in index cases and in at-risk family members. Furthermore, the emerging field of rapid nephrogenomics promises streamlined diagnosis and management, with a potential impact on early therapeutic strategy. Importantly, although costs continue to decrease, the integration of genomic technologies in nephrology practice raises several ethical concerns, especially regarding variants of uncertain significance, and incidental or secondary findings. Establishing multidisciplinary frameworks should maximize the potential of nephrogenomics to improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40524009What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.