ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2025
Prediction of long-term HBsAg seroclearance in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B.
Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- KASL clinical practice guidelines for management of chronic hepatitis B Endorsed by the East Asia Liver Alliance (EALA).Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2026Article
- Integrated metabolomics analysis identifies distinct amino acid signatures in chronic hepatitis B patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Hepatitis B functional cure: Current and future perspective.World journal of hepatology · 2025Review
- A machine learning-based predictive model for 48-week hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with pegylated interferon α-2b: prediction at week 24.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & Aims: Predicting the long-term HBsAg seroclearance, an ideal endpoint, is relevant for decision-making regarding antiviral therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This study aimed to identify predictors and develop a prediction model for HBsAg seroclearance in patients with HBeAg-negative CHB. Methods: A total of 2,032 untreated HBeAg-negative patients who underwent a 2-year baseline observation period were enrolled. Prediction models were developed using independent predictors of seroclearance, and their performance was evaluated through internal and external validation using an independent cohort of 753 patients, along with sensitivity analyses. Results: The estimated annual incidence of HBsAg seroclearance was 2.22% (15,508 person-years). Conclusions: The HepBLOSS models for HBsAg seroclearance exhibited an outstanding ability to stratify the probability of seroclearance over a 15-year period. These models hold promising potential to guide treatment decisions, aiming to achieve a functional cure in patients with CHB. Impact and implications: Achieving a functional cure for chronic hepatitis B, defined as HBsAg seroclearance, is a realistic treatment endpoint, especially given the virus's lifelong persistence in hepatocytes and its significant association with improved prognosis. This study identified independent predictors of seroclearance, including HBV DNA levels, age, sex, and HBsAg levels, and developed a robust prediction model based on these factors. The models demonstrated strong predictive accuracy over a 15-year period, offering valuable guidance for clinicians in establishing treatment strategies and predicting patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.