ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2025
Deep learning predicts the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with triple negative breast cancer.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for triple-negative breast cancer from imaging to multi-omics.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subcategory of breast cancer with poor prognosis and high risk of recurrence after treatment. In a subset of cases systemic chemotherapy is offered before surgery, so called neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), to downstage the disease resulting in 40-50% of cases to a pathological complete response. Meanwhile, patients receiving NAC suffer from toxic side effects and in a proportion of patients a significant amount of residual tumor remains. This study aims to predict the outcome of NAC with deep learning technology based on the microscopic morphological characteristics in whole slide images of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides from the pre-operative tumor biopsy before chemotherapy. Methods: A convolutional neural network was trained on 221 H&E-stained biopsies of carcinoma of no special type from 205 patients scanned at 40×. Cases were divided in three cohorts, with a good, moderate, or bad response to NAC based on the EUSOMA scoring according to the pathology report of the subsequent tumor surgery specimen. We defined good, moderate, and bad response as residual tumor <10%, 10-50%, and >50%, respectively. Manual segmentation of the tumor area was performed comprising invasive carcinoma with a small rim of surrounding benign tissue. The model was tested on 52 new biopsies of 50 patients. Because of the relative low number of moderate and bad responder cases, and to achieve a better discrimination for potential visual biomarkers, the moderate and bad response cohorts were merged. Results: The predictive performance of the model was calculated by means of the area under the receiver operator curve (AUC ROC). 95% Confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for better understanding of the range of values. In the test set, the AUC ROC performance score was 0.696 with a CI of 0.532-0.861. Conclusion: This proof-of-concept study shows that H&E pre-operative biopsies from TNBC, by means of deep learning technology, contain valuable information having predictive value for the outcome of NAC resulting in an AUC value of 0.696 outperforming a predictive AUC value of 0.63 based on structured clinical data of histological tumor grade, TILs, and ki-67 known from the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.