ReviewDrugs in context2025
Platinum-induced ototoxicity and hearing impairment in children and adolescents.
Review in Drugs in context, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progressive Sensorineural Hearing Loss Following Cisplatin Chemotherapy: Mechanisms Underlying Cochlear Retention and Long-Term Ototoxicity.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Ototoxicity Associated with Antineoplastic Agents in the Pediatric Population: An Evidence-Based Review of Auditory Monitoring Strategies and Contemporary Diagnostic Frameworks-Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) reveals hearing loss up to 16 kHz in pediatric chemotherapy patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Activating GPR55 protects cochlear hair cells against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity via inhibiting MAPK pathway.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Pharmacogenomics of Antineoplastic Therapy in Children: Genetic Determinants of Toxicity and Efficacy.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Platinum compounds play a crucial role in the treatment of solid tumours in paediatric patients, significantly improving survival rates. However, these treatments can result in hearing loss as a side-effect that can significantly impact the quality of life of young cancer survivors. Whilst the therapeutic benefits of platinum compounds in paediatric oncology are indisputable, addressing the challenge of ototoxicity remains a priority. Early and regular auditory function assessments, with tools such as audiometry, otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem response testing, are critical during platinum-based therapy, playing key roles in the early detection of hearing loss. Interdisciplinary collaboration amongst paediatric oncologists, audiologists and otolaryngologists is essential for optimal management and to minimize the long-term consequences of hearing loss. This narrative review concludes that, whilst platinum-based chemotherapeutic agents demonstrate significant therapeutic efficacy in paediatric malignancies, platinum-induced ototoxicity remains a substantial clinical challenge. Continued research into prevention, monitoring and treatment strategies is essential for preserving hearing and improving the overall quality of life for survivors of childhood cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.