Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40524896›Full record

Trial reportJournal of pain research2025

Clinical Efficacy of Electroacupuncture in the Treatment of Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Wenting Li, Xiaoyang Liu, Jiahui Lin, Jianpeng Huang, Sheng Li, Nenggui Xu, Wenbin Fu, Jianhua Liu

Abstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wenting Li *Acupuncture Research Team, The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoyang Liu *Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
Jiahui LinAcupuncture Research Team, The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6607-3489
Jianpeng HuangAcupuncture Research Team, The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Sheng LiAcupuncture Research Team, The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Nenggui XuSouth China Research Center for Acupuncture, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Wenbin FuAcupuncture Research Team, The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Jianhua LiuAcupuncture Research Team, The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Chronic neck pain (CNP) is a common but challenging symptom in clinical practice. Acupuncture is widely used in alleviating the symptoms of CNP. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture (EA) in patients with CNP and to quantify the specific effects of EA by controlling for placebo effects. Patients and Methods: A randomized sham-controlled trial was conducted at the outpatient departments of single hospital in China from November 2019 to November 2020 and a total of 105 participants with CNP were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to the EA group, sham electroacupuncture (SEA) group and waiting list (WL) group. The primary outcome was change in the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ). Secondary outcomes included McGill Pain Questionnaire (MG), visual analogue scale (VAS) and pain threshold (PT). Results: This randomized clinical trial included 98 patients. The EA group demonstrated a greater reduction in NPQ scores compared to the SEA group after 10 sessions (-7.2564, 95% CI=-12.2875 to -2.2253, Conclusion: This randomized clinical trial found that, in patients with CNP, EA significantly improved the symptoms compared with SEA and WL groups both immediately and cumulatively (at 5 weeks), and these benefits persisted through week 17. These comparisons demonstrated that EA's clinical benefits exceeded placebo effects.

Indexed as

analgesic effectchronic neck painelectroacupunctureplacebo effectrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID40524896
PMCPMC12169039

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.