ArticleInnovation in aging2025
How's Your Memory? Convergence of Objective and Subjective Memory Performance Using Ambulatory Assessment in Middle Age.
Article in Innovation in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of the Spatial Navigation and Memory Questionnaire (SPAM).Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The association between subjective and objective memory in established adulthood and midlife remains understudied, despite its potential importance for early cognitive health interventions. This study examined their convergence in adults aged 28-51, characterizing objective memory through performance level, change, and variability. Furthermore, we explored how sociodemographic and psychological factors moderate the subjective-objective memory convergence, aiming to elucidate the complex interplay between perceived and actual cognitive function in these critical life stages. Research Design and Methods: Adults in established adulthood and midlife ( Results: Better initial memory performance and improvement over time predicted enhanced subjective memory performance assessments in naturalistic settings, with objective memory change emerging as the strongest predictor. Notably, intraindividual variability in objective memory showed no systematic relationship with subjective evaluations, and psychological and sociodemographic variables did not moderate the objective-subjective memory performance relationship. Discussion and Implications: These findings highlight the complexity of subjective-objective memory performance relationships in established adulthood. Our results demonstrate the utility of smartphone-based momentary assessments for capturing both longitudinal trajectories and day-to-day variability in cognitive performance. This methodology offers promising opportunities for studying cognitive function in naturalistic settings during established adulthood, potentially contributing to our understanding of early cognitive changes across the lifespan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.