Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40525674›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics2025

Genetics of Response to ECT, TMS, Ketamine and Esketamine.

Clio E Franklin, Murat Altinay, Kala Bailey, Mahendra T Bhati, Brent R Carr, Susan K Conroy, Khurshid Khurshid, William M McDonald, Brian J Mickey, James W Murrough and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Clio E FranklinDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-8187-756X
Murat AltinayDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Kala BaileyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Mahendra T BhatiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Brent R CarrDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7771-4886
Susan K ConroyDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Khurshid KhurshidDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Memorial Health, Worchester, Massachusetts, USA.
William M McDonaldDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Brian J MickeyDepartment of Psychiatry, Huntsman Mental Health Institute, University of Utah Health School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
James W MurroughDepartments of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Sean M NestorDepartment of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Thomas Nickl-JockschatDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Irving M RetiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Gerard SanacoraDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Nicholas T TrappDepartment of Psychiatry, Carver College of Medicine, and Iowa Neuroscience Institute, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Biju ViswanathDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.
Jesse H WrightDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Peter P ZandiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8423-2623
James B PotashDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5802-8079

Funding

1/2 Genetics at an extreme: an efficient genomic study of individuals with clinically severe major depression receiving ECTR01MH121542 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ZANDI, PETER P. · 2019 to 2025
$6.7M
2/2 Genetics at an extreme: an efficient genomic study of individuals with clinically severe major depression receiving ECTR01MH121545 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SULLIVAN, PATRICK F · 2019 to 2023
$2.9M
Centre for Brain and Mind Grant of the Rohini Nilekani PhilanthropiesDBT/Wellcome Trust India Alliance Intermediate (Clinical and Public Health) Research Fellowship IA/CPHI/20/1/505266NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121542NIMH NIH HHS R01MH121542NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121545NIMH NIH HHS R01MH121545Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment-resistant mood disorders are often managed with intensive interventions that include electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), ketamine, and esketamine, but the role of genetics in clinical response to those interventions is yet to be clearly determined. Here, we review the current literature on the genetics of response to these treatment modalities. To date, the limited number of studies done to investigate genetic predictors of treatment response have primarily focused on single variants in candidate genes, and none of these have been consistently reproducible. The majority of candidate gene studies examine the effect of variants in the COMT and BDNF genes on treatment response. There are a limited number of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) looking at treatment response, though they are almost all underpowered, with only one study including a sample size > 1000. As a result, there have been few single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) found to be associated with treatment response at a statistically significant level, all in genes other than COMT and BDNF. The challenge is now to generate data from a large group of patients undergoing these therapies in order to more robustly assess the genetic factors affecting treatment response. This will not only help establish genetic predictors of response, but also potentially develop differential predictors of response to available treatments, which could provide clinicians with critical information to aid in deciding which treatment modality to recommend for treatment-resistant depression. We are currently pursuing such a strategy in our 50-site worldwide Gen-ECT-ic consortium.

Indexed as

Electroconvulsive TherapyKetamineMood DisordersTranscranial Magnetic StimulationBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorCatechol O-MethyltransferaseGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideTreatment OutcomeBDNF protein, humanBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorCatechol O-MethyltransferaseCOMT protein, humanEsketamineKetamine

Identifiers

PMID40525674
PMCPMC12230785

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.