ReviewAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics2025
Genetics of Response to ECT, TMS, Ketamine and Esketamine.
Review in American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Treatment-resistant mood disorders are often managed with intensive interventions that include electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), ketamine, and esketamine, but the role of genetics in clinical response to those interventions is yet to be clearly determined. Here, we review the current literature on the genetics of response to these treatment modalities. To date, the limited number of studies done to investigate genetic predictors of treatment response have primarily focused on single variants in candidate genes, and none of these have been consistently reproducible. The majority of candidate gene studies examine the effect of variants in the COMT and BDNF genes on treatment response. There are a limited number of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) looking at treatment response, though they are almost all underpowered, with only one study including a sample size > 1000. As a result, there have been few single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) found to be associated with treatment response at a statistically significant level, all in genes other than COMT and BDNF. The challenge is now to generate data from a large group of patients undergoing these therapies in order to more robustly assess the genetic factors affecting treatment response. This will not only help establish genetic predictors of response, but also potentially develop differential predictors of response to available treatments, which could provide clinicians with critical information to aid in deciding which treatment modality to recommend for treatment-resistant depression. We are currently pursuing such a strategy in our 50-site worldwide Gen-ECT-ic consortium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.