Evidence mapPaperPMID 40526694Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Economic impact of the Elecsys anti-Müllerian hormone Plus immunoassay for anti-Müllerian hormone testing as part of polycystic ovary syndrome assessment in the United Kingdom.

Osvaldo Ulises Garay, Anna-Maria Olziersky, Joop Laven, Rebecca Mawson, Terhi Piltonen, Stephen Franks, Johanna Sillman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Osvaldo Ulises GarayRoche Diagnostics International Ltd, Rotkreuz, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4836-4247
Anna-Maria OlzierskyRoche Diagnostics International Ltd, Rotkreuz, Switzerland.
Joop LavenDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Erasmus University Medical Center, Division of Reproductive Medicine Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Rebecca MawsonDivision of Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6377-6197
Terhi PiltonenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Research Unit of Clinical Medicine and Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Stephen FranksInstitute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Johanna SillmanRoche Diagnostics International Ltd, Rotkreuz, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine disorder among women. Current international PCOS assessment and management guidelines recommend anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) as an alternative to transvaginal ultrasound for assessing polycystic ovarian morphology, which is one of three criteria for diagnosing PCOS. This study assessed the economic impact of using the Elecsys® AMH Plus immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics International Ltd, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) for AMH testing in the United Kingdom health system to assess women with signs and symptoms of PCOS. A decision tree model estimated the costs and health outcomes of using the Elecsys AMH Plus immunoassay to determine polycystic ovarian morphology as part of PCOS assessment in a simulated cohort of women aged 25-45 years who were exposed to different diagnosis pathways. The comparator scenario was the standard of care, where transvaginal ultrasound was used for assessment. Base-case results indicated that the Elecsys AMH Plus immunoassay could lead to cost savings of £284,029 per year on the total cost of PCOS diagnosis (1.4% reduction vs. transvaginal ultrasound), in addition to savings on managing secondary comorbidities, such as type 2 diabetes and stroke care. Cost savings with the Elecsys AMH Plus immunoassay were observed in all scenarios versus using transvaginal ultrasound, including scenarios with various referral rates to specialists and dropout rates from the diagnosis pathway, and low adherence to lifestyle recommendations. With the known current delays in the United Kingdom for diagnosis of PCOS, implementing the Elecsys AMH Plus immunoassay for AMH testing may not only provide cost benefits, but also reduce waiting times for diagnosis and treatment, improving patient health outcomes.

Indexed as

Anti-Mullerian HormonePolycystic Ovary SyndromeAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansImmunoassayMiddle AgedUnited KingdomAnti-Mullerian Hormone

Identifiers

PMID40526694
PMCPMC12173178

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.