ArticleDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2025
Simulation-based training significantly improved confidence and clinical skills of resident doctors in acute diabetes management.
Article in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing expertise in management of gestational diabetes mellitus: protocol for development of structured curriculum.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Preschool and primary school teachers' attitudes toward students with type 1 diabetes: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Simulation-based training significantly improved confidence and clinical skills of resident doctors in acute diabetes management.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThe joint consensus of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes highlights the need for practical, up-to-date training in acute diabetes care. Therefore, this session aimed to develop an applied learning intervention that identifies key gaps in acute diabetes training, assesses participants' change in confidence in managing these scenarios following the intervention and evaluates participants' satisfaction and the intervention's relevance to practice.
methodsTo design the programme, we adopted Kern's six-step curriculum development framework. Clinical experts were interviewed to assess general needs, and students and resident doctors were interviewed to assess targeted needs. The SIMBA (Simulation via Instant Messaging for Bedside Application) model was adopted to develop cases alongside generative AI and expert input. Pre- and post-session surveys assessed participants' confidence, while the latter also assessed satisfaction and relevance to practice.
results33 participants attended the session. 17 participants completed both pre- and post-session surveys and were included in the study. Simulation performance scores averaged 4.0/5 for history taking, interpretation and clinical judgement; 3.9/5 for physical examination and investigations; and 3.6/5 for management. Confidence in managing acute diabetes scenarios improved significantly (pre vs. post: 33.3% vs. 78.4%, p < 0.001). 94.1% strongly agreed the cases were relevant, and 82.3% preferred this teaching method over traditional approaches.
conclusionThe model identified the need for targeted education on physical examination, investigations and management specific to acute diabetes scenarios. Simulation-based education significantly enhances confidence and is perceived as highly relevant for training in acute diabetes management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.