ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
The role of learned song in the evolution and speciation of Eastern and Spotted towhees.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oscine songbirds learn vocalizations that function in mate attraction and territory defense; sexual selection pressures on these learned songs could thus accelerate speciation. The Eastern and Spotted towhees are recently diverged sister species that now have partially overlapping ranges with evidence of some hybridization. Widespread community-science recordings of these species, including songs within their zone of overlap and from potential hybrids, enable us to investigate whether song differentiation might facilitate their reproductive isolation. Here, we quantify 16 song features to analyze geographic variation in Spotted and Eastern towhee songs and assess species-level differences. We then use several machine learning models to measure how accurately their songs can be classified by species. While no single song feature reliably distinguishes the two species, machine learning models classified songs with relatively high accuracy (random forest: 89.5%, deep learning: 90%, gradient boosting machine: 88%, convolutional neural network: 88%); interestingly, species classification was less accurate in their zone of overlap. Finally, our analysis of the limited publicly available genetic data from each species supports the hypothesis that the species are reproductively isolated. Together, our results suggest that small variations in multiple features may contribute to these sister species' ability to recognize their species-specific songs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.