ArticleJCO precision oncology2025
Functional Characterization of Variants of Unknown Significance of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors 1-4 and Comparison With AI Model-Based Prediction.
Article in JCO precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mutated FGFR1 is an oncogenic driver and therapeutic target in high-risk neuroblastoma.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs; FGFR1, FGFR2, FGFR3, FGFR4) are frequently mutated oncogenes in solid cancers. The oncogenic potential of FGFR rearrangements and few hotspot point mutations is well established, but the majority of variants resulting from point mutations especially outside of the tyrosine kinase domain are currently considered variants of unknown significance (VUS). MATERIALS AND
methodsRecurrent nonkinase domain FGFR VUS variants were collected from the Catalog of Somatic Mutations in Cancer and their oncogenic potential was assessed in vitro by different functional assays. We compiled published clinical and preclinical data on FGFR variants and compared the data with results from our functional assays and pathogenicity predictions of state-of-the-art artificial intelligence (AI) models.
resultsWe identified 12 novel FGFR extracellular small variants with potential driver function. Comparison of clinical and preclinical data on FGFR variants with pathogenicity predictions of state-of-the-art AI models showed limited usefulness of the AI predictions. Sensitivity profiles of activating FGFR variants to targeted inhibitors were recorded and showed good targetability of FGFR nonkinase domain variants.
conclusionThe collected results extend the spectrum of suitable FGFR variants for potential treatment with FGFR inhibitors in the context of clinical trials and beyond. Current AI models for variant pathogenicity prediction require further refinement for use in oncogenic decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.