Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40527974›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Endocrinology2025

Hyponatraemia in ageing.

Sophie Monnerat, Mirjam Christ-Crain, Julie Refardt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Copeptin kinetics in healthy aging.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sophie MonneratDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0179-7889
Mirjam Christ-CrainDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6336-0965
Julie RefardtDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland. j.refardt@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3040-4685

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyponatraemia is the most common electrolyte disorder in both inpatient and outpatient settings and mostly affects older adults, in whom intrinsic factors (such as chronic heart, liver or kidney diseases and malignancies) and extrinsic factors (such as polypharmacy and malnutrition) favouring hyponatraemia are highly prevalent. Importantly, its occurrence is expected to increase exponentially with global warming. Chronic hyponatraemia is associated with an increased risk of falling, osteoporosis and fractures, attention deficits, and even mortality. In the past two decades, a growing number of studies have suggested that correcting hyponatraemia improves clinical outcomes, outlining hyponatraemia management as a part of promoting healthy ageing. In addition, SGLT2 inhibitors and protein supplementation have been shown to be efficacious in treating hyponatraemia, both of which represent attractive and holistic treatment options in older adults. However, despite hyponatraemia being encountered in all medical specialties, its clinical burden is often overlooked, partly due to low awareness but also to low confidence in applying diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms. In this Review, we aim to depict the consequences of hyponatraemia, characterize the most common aetiologies in older individuals, and finally detail the diagnostic pathway as well as the benefits and limitations of the available treatment options.

Indexed as

AgingHyponatremiaAgedHumans

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.