ReviewReviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders2025
Exploring obesity phenotypes: a longitudinal perspective.
Review in Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Weight regain after obesity treatment: mechanisms, predictors, and real-world evidence from the IGOBE program.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
- Phosphomannomutase 1 restrains adipose thermogenic programming via inosine signaling.Molecular metabolism · 2026Article
- Article
- Deciphering obesity: a conceptual overview and synthesis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional reliance on Body Mass Index (BMI) as a diagnostic tool for obesity is increasingly challenged due to its inability to differentiate between fat and lean mass and to capture fat distribution. Emerging evidence-including findings from our longitudinal study in Latino patients with obesity and insights from the 2025 Lancet Commission on Obesity-suggests that a comprehensive evaluation of body composition is essential for accurate risk stratification. This review synthesizes historical perspectives and recent developments in obesity phenotyping, detailing how the field has evolved from simple BMI-based assessments to multifaceted approaches incorporating bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and supplementary anthropometric measures such as waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio. We also examine the metabolic, genetic, and hormonal mechanisms underlying phenotypic variability, which help explain why individuals with similar BMIs may exhibit markedly different health risks. By integrating our original data with an extensive review of current literature, we demonstrate that refined obesity phenotyping can serve as an early indicator of progression from preclinical to clinical obesity. Such nuanced classifications offer the potential for more personalized therapeutic interventions aimed at optimizing weight loss outcomes and reducing cardiometabolic risk. Overall, our findings advocate for a multidimensional approach to obesity assessment that promises to improve clinical outcomes through tailored, phenotype-based strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.