ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
A Case Study of Food Insecurity Screening and Referral: Implementation Barriers, Facilitators, and Lessons from a Healthcare-Food Bank Partnership.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Referrals for Food Assistance at Health Resources and Services Administration Health Centers.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Over 20 Years of Training in Community-based Participatory Research and Service Learning through the Community Health Fellowship Program.Journal of community health · 2026Article
- Prevalence Of Food Insecurity And Associated Factors Among Adults Living With Chronic Pain In Quebec, Canada: A Cross-Sectional Study.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRoutine food insecurity screening in healthcare is recommended, yet the impact of community referrals remains uncertain. This study examined whether food-insecure patients identified through a free cancer screening program were successfully connected to resources via a local food bank partnership.
methodsWomen screened for breast or cervical cancer through a state-funded grant were assessed for food insecurity using the Hunger Vital Signs tool. Patients identified as food insecure were offered referrals to food bank services during a follow up call. One to three weeks later, a brief telephone survey assessed barriers and facilitators to accessing food.
resultsOf the 451 patients screened (average age 46 years, 54.3% Spanish-speaking), 92 (20%) were identified as food insecure and received follow-up calls, with 64 (69%) responding. Referrals accepted included government food assistance (23%), home delivery (6%), and both services (8%). Of the 24 patients referred to SNAP or home delivery services, 21 (87%) responded to follow-up calls, and 8 (33%) of these successfully received the referred services.
conclusionsIntegrating food insecurity screening in health care settings is a promising approach to connect at risk patients with food. Future programs should consider barriers and facilitators to connecting with resources within their community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.