ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
Nonsuicidal self-injury prediction with pain-processing neural circuits using interpretable graph neural network.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 7T multimodal MRI reveals structural-functional-quantitative susceptibility mapping abnormalities of new daily persistent headache.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) involves the intentional destruction of one's own body tissues without suicidal intent. Prior research has shown that individuals with NSSI exhibit abnormal pain perception; however, the pain-processing neural circuits underlying NSSI remain poorly understood. This study leverages graph neural networks to predict NSSI risk and examine the learned connectivity of neural underpinnings using multimodal data.
methodsResting-state functional MRI and diffusion tensor imaging were collected from 50 patients with NSSI, 79 healthy controls (HC), and 44 patients with mental disorder who did not engage in NSSI as disease controls (DC). We constructed pain-related brain networks for each participant. An interpretable graph attention networks (GAT) model was developed, considering demographic factors, to predict NSSI risk and highlight NSSI-specific connectivity using learned attention matrices.
resultsThe proposed GAT model based on imaging data achieved an accuracy of 80%, and increased to 88% when self-reported pain scales were incorporated alongside imaging data in distinguishing patients with NSSI from HC. It highlighted amygdala-parahippocampus and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG)-insula connectivity as pivotal in NSSI-related pain processing. After incorporating imaging data of DC, the model's accuracy reached 74%, underscoring consistent neural connectivity patterns. The GAT model demonstrates high predictive accuracy for NSSI, enhanced by including self-reported pain scales.
conclusionsOur proposed GAT model underscores the significance in the functional integration of limbic regions, paralimbic regions and IFG in NSSI pain processing. Our findings suggest altered pain processing as a key mechanism in NSSI, providing insights for potential neural modulation intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.