Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40528501›Full record

ReviewRegenerative medicine2025

Unlocking the potential of injectable hydrogels for cartilage repair.

Arjan Atwal, Ali Mahnavi, Pooya Davoodi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Regenerative medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Arjan AtwalSchool of Allied Health Professions and Pharmacy, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Ali MahnaviSchool of Allied Health Professions and Pharmacy, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Pooya DavoodiSchool of Allied Health Professions and Pharmacy, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA), a prevalent degenerative joint disease, poses significant global health implications and is characterized by progressive degradation of articular cartilage, resulting in debilitating pain and disability. Current treatments often provide only symptomatic relief or require multiple invasive open-joint procedures that are both costly and surgically complex. This review intends to evaluate key design considerations, drawing inspiration from clinically approved therapeutics and recent advances in the field that can truly unlock the potential of injectable hydrogels in cartilage tissue engineering. These include the choice of cargo, hydrogel architecture, and critical factors that are often overlooked in injectable hydrogels, such as ensuring integration with native tissue and restoring joint lubrication. The manuscript also addresses key barriers to clinical translation, including navigating stringent regulatory pathways and optimizing hydrogel performance to meet the mechanical and biological demands of the joint environment. Finally, the review outlines future research directions with emphasis on acellular off-the-shelf strategies, and personalized medicine approaches informed by advances in -omics and high-throughput screening data to accelerate the clinical translation of next-generation injectable hydrogels for effective cartilage repair.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularHydrogelsOsteoarthritisTissue EngineeringAnimalsHumansInjectionsHydrogelsCartilage tissue regenerationinjectable hydrogelsminimally invasive surgeryosteoarthritispolymeric biomaterials

Identifiers

PMID40528501
PMCPMC12506915

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.