ReviewInnovation (Cambridge (Mass.))2025
Foundation models and intelligent decision-making: Progress, challenges, and perspectives.
Review in Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Foundation models in biomedical imaging: turning hype into reality.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Model Counseling for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Diabetes: Source-Masked Multirater Comparative Evaluation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Tensor language model enables generative scheduling for efficient tensor compilation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Transformative Resilience in European Health Governance After COVID-19: A Policy Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- AI-driven nanomedicine for cancer theranostics.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- The role of artificial intelligence-based foundation models and "copilots" in cancer pathology: potential and challenges.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025Review
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Coal Mine Disaster Risks: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Orchestrating Embodied Systems through the Embodied Context Protocol: Motivation, Progress, and Directions.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
- A systematic review of vision and vision-language foundation models in ophthalmology.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchReview
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
71 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intelligent decision-making (IDM) is a cornerstone of artificial intelligence (AI) designed to automate or augment decision processes. Modern IDM paradigms integrate advanced frameworks to enable intelligent agents to make effective and adaptive choices and decompose complex tasks into manageable steps, such as AI agents and high-level reinforcement learning. Recent advances in multimodal foundation-based approaches unify diverse input modalities-such as vision, language, and sensory data-into a cohesive decision-making process. Foundation models (FMs) have become pivotal in science and industry, transforming decision-making and research capabilities. Their large-scale, multimodal data-processing abilities foster adaptability and interdisciplinary breakthroughs across fields such as healthcare, life sciences, and education. This survey examines IDM's evolution, advanced paradigms with FMs and their transformative impact on decision-making across diverse scientific and industrial domains, highlighting the challenges and opportunities in building efficient, adaptive, and ethical decision systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.