ArticleInternational medical case reports journal2025
Successful Management of Incidentally-Detected Subclavian Stenosis During Anesthetic Preparation for Spinal Surgery: A Case Report.
Article in International medical case reports journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Subclavian artery stenosis is mainly caused by atherosclerotic changes, which may result in ischemic events in the upper limbs and the central nervous system. Other etiological causes include radiation exposure, vasculitis, neurofibromatosis, external compression syndrome, and fibromuscular dysplasia. The conventional anesthetic challenge for these patients is to maintain cerebral perfusion. Case Presentation: We present a case of incidentally discovered left subclavian stenosis in a 65-year-old male who was admitted for spinal surgery. The patient had a history of peripheral arterial disease, diabetes mellitus, and heavy smoking. During the preoperative assessment, the blood pressure readings in the department were within the normal range. In the operating theater, blood pressure readings of the two arms revealed readings of 136/85 mmHg and 235/114 mmHg in the right and left arms, respectively. Accordingly, the operation was postponed for further evaluation of the increased interarm systolic blood pressure difference. Computed tomography angiography revealed focal stenosis at the origin of the left subclavian artery, causing approximately 90% narrowing. The patient underwent a successful subclavian artery angioplasty. Conclusion: It is important to report BP readings of blood pressure in both arms of patients with a history of peripheral arterial disease, heavy smoking, or severe metabolic syndrome. Patients with subclavian stenosis are prone to increased inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference. Accordingly, the bilateral measurement of BP is a simple test with valuable impact on the preanesthetic assessment in an emergency setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.