ArticleFundamental research2025
Machine learning-based prediction models for atopic dermatitis diagnosis and evaluation.
Article in Fundamental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- ADAM19: biological characteristics and implications in disease pathology and clinical applications.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026Review
- Epithelial-Dermal Immune Memory: TrackingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- Advances in the study and application of digital technology in the clinical practice of atopic dermatitis.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common chronic inflammatory skin disease seriously affecting the quality of life of patients. Reliable and accurate evaluation methods are necessary for early diagnosis and effective AD treatment. Thus, this study used machine learning (ML) to explore a novel diagnostic and therapeutic effect evaluation model for AD. Firstly, candidate model genes were screened from an integrated data set of four AD-related microarray datasets: GSE133477, GSE32924, GSE58558, and GSE107361, using Robust Rank Aggregation (RRA), and protein-protein interaction network (PPI). Next, three recognized models (REC) and three AD-associated gene models (AAG) established with LASSO, Logistic linear regression (LR), and random forest (RF) were developed and tested separately using GSE130588 and GSE99802 datasets. The results revealed that REC model of LASSO (model genes including
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.