Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40529136›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025

Risk prediction models for sarcopenia in elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jie Yin, Yiyong Xu, Mian Cai, Xiwei Fang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jie Yin *School of Nursing, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Yiyong Xu *School of Nursing, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Mian CaiSchool of Nursing, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Xiwei FangSchool of Nursing, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to systematically review and evaluate risk prediction models for sarcopenia in older adults. The goal is to offer a reference for clinicians in selecting or developing suitable sarcopenia risk prediction models for the elderly. Methods: A systematic search was performed across CNKI, Wanfang Database, VIP Database, SinoMed, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for studies on risk prediction models of sarcopenia in older adults. The time frame for the search was from the creation of these databases to 13 August 2024. The literature was independently vetted by two researchers, who also gathered data and assessed the included studies' applicability and bias risk. Results: A total of 29 studies with 70 sarcopenia prediction models were included, with a total sample size of 140,386 and 13,472 sarcopenia events. Frequently reported independent predictors in multivariate models included BMI, age, and gender. Meta-analysis showed a combined AUC of 0.9125 [95% CI (0.9254-0.8996)], indicating good overall model predictive performance. Issues in modeling included inappropriate predictive factor screening methods, insufficient sample sizes, and lack of external validation, resulting in high study bias risk and limited model generalizability. Conclusion: Current elderly sarcopenia risk prediction models have considerable room for improvement in overall quality and applicability. Future modeling should follow PROBAST guidelines to reduce bias risk, incorporate predictive factors with theoretical foundation and clinical significance, and strengthen external validation. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/Diew/CRD42025636116, identifier CRD42025636116.

Indexed as

elderlymodelpredictionsarcopeniasystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40529136
PMCPMC12171125

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.