Evidence mapPaperPMID 40529152Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025

Biomarkers of traumatic brain injury: narrative review and future prospects in neurointensive care.

Marta Pryzmont, Urszula Kosciuczuk, Mateusz Maciejczyk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Multi-dimensional plasma proteomic profiling elucidates molecular mechanisms and pathophysiological networks in pediatric severe traumatic brain injury.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marta PryzmontDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Bialystok, Białystok, Poland.
Urszula KosciuczukDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Bialystok, Białystok, Poland.
Mateusz MaciejczykDepartment of Hygiene, Epidemiology, and Ergonomics, Medical University of Bialystok, Białystok, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant medical problem because of its high early mortality rate in intensive care and high risk of severe neurological complications in long-term follow-ups. Craniocerebral injuries are one of the most important issues in intensive therapy due to the limited prognostic possibilities for the neurological consequences of such injuries. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are the most common and available radiological tools for presenting and describing morphological brain damage in the acute and chronic phases of TBI. The use of biomarkers may improve the accuracy of establishing the severity and prognoses in patients with severe traumatic brain damage. Based on the available publications, there is no definitive and accurate single marker that has high prognostic value regarding neurological brain tissue damage; however, the combination of several biomolecules (i.e., biomarkers of neuronal, astrocyte, and cytoskeleton disruption and chemokines) significantly increases the diagnostic value. Most scientific studies are based on serum and cerebrospinal fluid assays. This publication presents the current state of the knowledge about the markers of nervous tissue damage in the brain and their clinical utility in mortality prediction and neurological prognosis in critical neurointensive care. Moreover, this review article presents the correlations between the biomarkers, radiological signs of brain injury, and clinical scales, as well as the latest scientific and publication trends, such as microRNA genetic studies and different laboratory assay methodologies using various biological materials.

Indexed as

braincritical careexosomeneuroprognosisneurotrauma

Identifiers

PMID40529152
PMCPMC12170592

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.