ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
Computational vaccine development against protozoa.
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the Binding Specificity of Siglec-Derived Peptides to Human Primary Amine Oxidase Using an Integrative Approach to Ligand Epitope Mapping.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Comparative 5' IsomiRome Analysis Uncovers Dysregulated 5' IsomiRs inComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Cavity-Filling Mutations as a Strategy to Stabilize Prefusion Viral Fusion Proteins for Vaccine Design.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- STRUMP-I: Structure-Based Machine Learning Approach to pMHC-I Binding Prediction Using Force Field Energy Features.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- From empirical vaccinology to predictive systems-based vaccine design: multi-omics integration, artificial intelligence, and global equity challenges.Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protozoan parasites remain a major global health and economic burden, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Conventional strategies such as chemotherapy and vector control face growing limitations due to resistance, toxicity, and implementation challenges. Vaccination represents a sustainable solution, but the complexity of protozoan life cycles and antigenic diversity has hindered vaccine development. Computational vaccinology offers innovative tools to overcome these barriers, combining immuno-informatics, reverse vaccinology, and artificial intelligence to accelerate the identification of immunogenic epitopes and streamline vaccine design. This review explores the current landscape of computational vaccine development against protozoa, highlighting advances in epitope prediction, population-specific vaccine design, and digital twin technologies. Applications include multivalent vaccines targeting conserved antigens across species, personalized formulations based on host immunogenetics, and the emerging use of protozoan vectors in cancer immunotherapy. Despite these promising avenues, significant challenges remain, particularly the need for robust experimental validation, improved delivery systems for short peptides, and greater acceptance of in silico methods by the broader scientific community. We argue that integrating computational tools with experimental immunology, high-throughput genomics, and translational research will be the key to developing safe, effective, and broadly accessible vaccines against protozoan infections. This convergence of disciplines has the potential to not only address neglected tropical diseases but also to establish new paradigms in precision vaccinology and immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.