ArticlePEC innovation2025
A novel outreach approach for identification of familial hypercholesterolemia: Interview-based formative evaluation to improve healthcare access and quality.
Article in PEC innovation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Novel strategies to FIND people living with genetic dyslipidemias: The family heart foundation flag, identify, network, and deliver (FIND) familial hypercholesterolemia collaborative learning network.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic condition which elevates cholesterol levels and increases risk of premature cardiac events. Medical treatment greatly reduces those risks. However, in the United States, FH is markedly underdiagnosed. We aimed to design and evaluate direct outreach and referral to specialty care for patients with an elevated risk of FH identified through application of a machine learning model and expert review of the electronic health record in a rural United States health system. Methods: Two sets of interviews: (1) seeking advice for designing outreach from a convenience sample comprising health professionals and members of the public both with and without FH and (2)) evaluating the outreach with a convenience sample of health professionals and patients who received the outreach. Two researchers conducted each interview. Thematic analysis included investigator triangulation. Results: We conducted 15 pre-outreach interviews and 32 post-outreach interviews. Most members of the public felt the outreach should be initiated by the patient's primary care clinician, while health professionals recommended outreach directly from a lipid specialist after notifying the primary care clinician. Outreach ultimately included primary care clinician notification; a mailed letter from lipid specialists to the patient indicating partnership with primary care; a message sent through the online patient portal; and a telephone call(s) from a lipid specialist to the patient. Phone calls were most impactful in prompting a clinical evaluation for FH. We identified 4 themes: (1) Both patients and clinical team members supported direct-to-patient outreach about FH; (2) Phone calls from lipid specialists to patients were considered high-value; (3) The importance of primary care team member involvement was perceived differently between pre- and post-outreach phases; and (4)) Outreach had a broader impact beyond the individual patients reached, including family screening. Innovation: This study provides key insights into the acceptable design and use of machine learning and electronic health record data for direct-to-patient outreach. Conclusions: Partnership with the target population led to direct-to-patient FH outreach that was acceptable to most recipients. High-touch engagement by lipid specialists included repeat phone calls, which maximized patients' response but are unlikely to be sustained in routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.