ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty in the USA: Nationwide adoption trends towards 70 % by 2030.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty and the risk of postoperative infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical practice guideline for physical therapist management of total knee arthroplasty: revision 2026.Physical therapy · 2026Guideline
- Public information-seeking about orthopedic surgical robotics: a decade-scale infodemiological analysis and forecast through 2030.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: accuracy, clinical outcomes, complications, learning curve and cost-effectiveness: a critical clinical review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Step-specific learning curve of the TMINI robotic system for total knee arthroplasty: a single-surgeon CUSUM analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Increasing Utilization Trends of Robotic Assistance in Orthopaedic Surgery.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026Article
- Implant-agnostic, handheld wireless robotics: multicenter efficiency and learning curve for total knee arthroplasty.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Observational
- Global research hotspots and emerging trends in orthopedic robotic surgery: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty in HIV-Positive Patients: Precision Surgery for a Changing Epidemic.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
- Robotic total hip and knee arthroplasty: economic impact and workflow efficiency.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Impact of robotic total hip and knee arthroplasty on resident and fellow training in orthopedic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Robotic-assistance is becoming more prevalent in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aims to (1) project the volume and percentage of manual (M-TKA) and robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) in the United States through 2030, and (2) compare healthcare utilization and postoperative complications between RA-TKA and M-TKA. Methods: Two national databases (Nationwide Inpatient Database and National Ambulatory Surgery Service Database) from 2012 to 2020 were queried for manual and robotic TKAs using ICD-10 and CPT codes. Future RA-TKA utilization was estimated using log-binomial regression modeling. The predicted probabilities from the regression models were multiplied by the projected population of each age-sex-hospital region subgroup per year through 2030. Results: RA-TKA utilization increased from 0.01 % in 2008 to 8.5 % in 2020. Projections indicate that by 2030, RA-TKA is expected to represent 70.1 % (95 % CI:65.5-74.5) of the 2,631,972 TKAs performed. M-TKA exhibited higher incidences of mechanical, non-mechanical, and infective complications compared to RA-TKA (1.8 % vs. 0.7 %; 30.1 % vs. 24.9 %; 1.8 % vs. 0.7 % respectively, p < 0.0001). A greater proportion of RA-TKA patients were discharged to home health care (88.7 % vs. 73 %, p < 0.0001), and they had shorter hospital stays (1.9 vs. 2.8 days, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: RA-TKA is anticipated to make up more than 70 % of all TKAs performed in the United States by 2030. The increasing integration of robotic technology raises the need for deeper explorations into value based on training, cost efficiency and long-term outcomes to understand the ramifications of widespread adoption of RA-TKA as a routine procedure. However, this study is limited by its retrospective design, reliance on administrative coding which may lead to misclassification, and the unavailability of outpatient data prior to 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.