ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Understanding school frontline workers' early implementation behavior: insights from the generation healthy kids study in Denmark.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute physiological and perceptual responses in the FIT FIRST FOR ALL school-based physical activity program.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Childhood obesity is a growing global public health issue, with significant implications for children's physical and psychological well-being. Schools offer a structured environment for implementing health-promoting interventions to address this challenge. This study examines how organizational conditions within schools influence frontline workers' (e.g., teachers and pedagogic staff) early implementation behavior in a school-based health intervention. Insights aim to inform strategies for enhancing the sustainability and effectiveness of such programs. Methods: The study utilizes a qualitative design, conducting 11 focus group interviews across 11 of the 12 intervention schools participating in the Generation Healthy Kids (GHK) intervention program in Denmark. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the COM-B Model for Behavior Change, the interviews explored organizational factors shaping frontline workers' capabilities, opportunities, and motivation for implementing GHK components. Thematic analysis, guided by predefined theoretical constructs, was applied to identify key patterns in the data. Results: The findings highlight organizational conditions within schools as critical to frontline workers' early implementation behavior. Capability was linked to training and resources, though time constraints hindered effective application. Opportunity was shaped by structural factors such as limited access to facilities, causing logistical challenges. Motivation was influenced by alignment with existing workflows, reflective beliefs about the program's relevance, and tension for change due to perceived pupil needs. Leadership emerged as a cross-cutting factor, with engaged leaders enhancing implementation through active support and resource coordination. Discussion: The study underscores the interplay between organizational conditions and frontline workers' behaviors in implementing health programs. Addressing logistical barriers, fostering supportive leadership, and ensuring alignment with school priorities are essential for successful implementation. These findings highlight the need for adaptive, school-specific implementation strategies to sustain health-promoting interventions like GHK and suggest stakeholder engagement to further optimize implementation processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.