ArticleMethodsX2025
Development of a questionnaire library for rapid health data acquisition during wildfire events.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Mental Health Impacts of Wildfire Exposure: A Scoping Review of the Quantitative Evidence.Current environmental health reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid health outcome data acquisition using existing questionnaires can accelerate time-sensitive wildfire research. We intended to create a health questionnaire library that contains readily deployable questionnaires for researchers, public health agencies, and other groups interested in rapid data collection during wildfire events. In this paper, we describe the methodology used to identify relevant self-reported health questionnaires and develop the structured questionnaire library, which serves as a centralized platform for wildfire researchers seeking to quickly design health assessment instruments. This method can also facilitate rapid questionnaire-based data collection following other disasters. To do so we performed the following tasks:•A systematic literature review of wildfire exposure and health studies to 1) identify health outcome categories associated with wildfire and smoke exposure and 2) extract questionnaires used for health outcomes related to wildfire exposure.•A secondary search of existing questionnaire repositories to identify additional relevant health instruments.•A structured organization of questionnaires (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.