ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
Differences in esophageal adenocarcinoma survival and treatment modalities by III/IV stage subgroup: a SEER population-based study.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) is an aggressive gastrointestinal carcinoma with high morbidity and mortality worldwide. This study was aimed at investigating the influences of T stage in patients with the same III/IV stage, and of various therapeutic modalities in each subgroup of III/IV stage in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Methods: Patients diagnosed with EAC between 2000 and 2019 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to select independent prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to determine survival differences according to T stage and treatment strategy in the III/IV stage subgroup. Results: Data from 5,765 EACs were identified. Seven independent risk factors were identified for OS and CSS. Based on T stage, patients with the same III/IV stage showed survival differences in the subgroup analyses in both OS and CSS (P<0.001). The median survival time in T2N1M0 in III stage and T1N2-3M0 in IVA stage was longer compared to the other groups, respectively. Concerning therapy modalities, chemotherapy alone or surgery alone showed a significant difference in terms of CSS in III stage subgroups (P<0.001, P=0.01, respectively), while surgery combined with chemotherapy also showed a significant difference (P=0.02). However, no survival difference was found in the subgroups of IVA stage based on therapy. Finally, chemotherapy plus surgery in early stages of III/IVA subgroups prominently increased the median survival time. Conclusions: Differences according to T stage may potentially influence EAC survival under the same III/IV stage. Our findings implied that higher T stage was associated with poorer prognosis among patients in the same III/IVA stage. Meanwhile, it was advised for patients to receive surgery plus chemotherapy in the early subgroups of III/IVA stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.