Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40530141›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2025

A real-world retrospective cohort study: the clinical outcomes and characteristics of platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer.

Qing Wang, Lei Kuang, Boyang Liu, Qi Chen, Yanyu Li, Jiayun Zhou, Jingbo Zhang, Xinhui Yang, Guiping Wan, Jörg Wischhusen and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Qing Wang *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Lei Kuang *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Boyang LiuGraduate School of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Qi ChenGraduate School of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Yanyu LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Jiayun ZhouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Jingbo ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Xinhui YangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Guiping WanNanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Jörg WischhusenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Julius-Maximilians University, Medical School, Würzburg, Germany.
Rosa A Salcedo-HernándezGynecological Cancers Division, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de México (Mexico's National Cancer Institute), Mexico City, Mexico.
Colton LadburyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Zeyuan YinThe First Clinical Medical School, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Bei ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Current clinical research on platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (PRROC) is primarily based on prospective clinical trials, while real-world evidence remains extremely scarce. The continuous accumulation of real-world evidence can effectively address the limitations of clinical trials, and real-world evidence is increasingly gaining recognition in guiding clinical practice. This study sought to describe the clinical outcomes and characteristics of patients diagnosed with PRROC in a real-world setting. Comparing clinical outcomes [e.g., progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)] of PRROC patients provides researchers with valuable insights into the current treatment status, effectiveness, and contributory factors of PRROC. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed diagnosis of OC from six tertiary referral centers in China from January 2018 to December 2023 were recruited at diagnosis of PRROC. All study patients were followed up to December 1, 2023. We evaluated the characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of these patients. In addition, the background characteristics of the patients were identified, and independent prognostic factors for OS were investigated. Results: In this cohort of 504 patients diagnosed with PRROC, 277 patients (54.96%) received a single-agent non-platinum chemotherapy, and 227 patients (45.04%) received a platinum-containing regimen. Compared to the single-agent non-platinum chemotherapy group, the platinum-based combination chemotherapy group had significantly longer PFS [5.6 vs. 4.0 months, hazard ratio (HR): 0.431, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.356-0.521, P<0.0001] and OS (15.9 Conclusions: In this real-world cohort, we found that patients diagnosed with PRROC, particularly those with a PFI of >3-6 months, experienced substantial benefits from the re-administration of platinum agents. Thus, platinum rechallenge therapy could represent a promising treatment approach for PRROC. Biomarkers of platinum sensitivity are needed in clinical practice to identify potential responders who should be offered re-treatment with platinum.

Indexed as

Platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (PRROC)real-world studysurvival analysistargeted therapytreatment patterns

Identifiers

PMID40530141
PMCPMC12170032

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.