ArticleCureus2025
Efficacy of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Alopecia in Jordanian Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune disorder causing non-scarring hair loss on the scalp, eyebrows, eyelashes, and other areas. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have emerged as promising treatments, but data on their efficacy in Middle Eastern populations, including Jordanians, are limited. The Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score is commonly used to assess disease severity, while Clinician-Reported Outcome (ClinRO) measures provide additional insights. Aim To evaluate the efficacy of JAK inhibitors in Jordanian AA patients using the SALT score as the primary outcome measure. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted at King Hussein Hospital, Jordanian Royal Medical Services, from January 2020 to December 2023. Medical records of AA patients aged ≥18 years treated with JAK inhibitors were reviewed. Data included demographics, disease duration, previous treatments, and adverse effects. Efficacy was assessed by the percentage change in SALT scores at six and 12 months. Statistical analyses included repeated-measures MANCOVA (Multivariate Analysis of Covariance), Chi-square, and independent t-test. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Results Our analysis included 57 patients, of which 31 (54.4%) received tofacitinib and 26 (45.6%) received baricitinib. A significantly higher proportion of baricitinib users had treatment durations >12 months (53.8%) compared to tofacitinib users (12.9%), while shorter durations (three to six months) were more common among tofacitinib users (41.9% vs. 15.4%;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.