ArticleFederal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS2024
Physician Attitudes About Veterans Affairs Video Connect Encounters.
Article in Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) launched the VA Video Connect (VVC) video conferencing platform to connect veterans with VA clinicians in 2018. We assessed practices, concerns, and perceptions toward VVC encounters among physicians within the VA New Mexico Healthcare System (VANMHCS). Methods: Medicine Service Physicians of VANMHCS who had previously completed ≥ 1 VVC encounter were invited to semistructured interviews. Questions were constructed to assess the following domains: overarching views of video telehealth, perceptions of the VVC application, and barriers to the broad implementation of video telehealth. Interviews were assessed using a qualitative, open-coding approach. Themes were constructed both deductively, through direct responses to interview questions, and inductively, by identifying emerging patterns in the data. Results: Of the 64 physicians invited to participate, 13 (20%) were interviewed. Of those interviewed, 9 (69%) were female, 10 (77%) were specialists, 8 (62%) had been practicing for ≥ 10 years, and 7 (54%) completed ≥ 5 VVC visits. Interviews ranged from 10 to 25 minutes. Five themes were observed: (1) VVC software and internet connection issues affected implementation; (2) patient technological literacy affected both veteran and physician comfort with VVC; (3) integration of supportive measures is desired; (4) clinical video telehealth (CVT) services may increasingly enhance access to care; and (5) in-person encounters provided unique advantages over CVT. Conclusions: Physicians believe VVC could lead to improved access to care for veterans facing geographical challenges. Efforts should focus on improving VVC user interface and addressing technological issues, educating veterans/physicians on the use of CVT, and integrating supportive measures for successful VVC encounters.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.