Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40530689›Full record

ReviewNucleic acids research2025

Next generation genetic screens in kinetoplastids.

James Budzak, T Nicolai Siegel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James BudzakDivision of Experimental Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, 82512, Germany.
T Nicolai SiegelDivision of Experimental Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, 82512, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1715-7907

Funding

EMBO Postdoctoral Fellowship ALTF 764-2022ERC-CoG 101044320German Research Foundation SI 1610/2-2German Research Foundation SI 1610/4-1Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Postdoctoral Fellowship 101105761 - VSG-SWITCHWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genomes of all organisms encode diverse functional elements, including thousands of genes and essential noncoding regions for gene regulation and genome organization. Systematic perturbation of these elements is crucial to understanding their roles and how their disruption impacts cellular function. Genetic perturbation approaches, which disrupt gene expression or function, provide valuable insights by linking genetic changes to observable phenotypes. However, perturbing individual genomic elements one at a time is impractical. Genetic screens overcome this limitation by enabling the simultaneous perturbation of numerous genomic elements within a single experiment. Traditionally, these screens relied on simple, high-throughput readouts such as cell fitness, differentiation, or one-dimensional fluorescence. However, recent advancements have introduced powerful technologies that combine genetic screens with image-based and single-cell sequencing readouts, allowing researchers to study how perturbations affect complex cellular phenotypes on a genome-wide scale. These innovations, alongside the development of CRISPR-Cas technologies, have significantly enhanced the precision, efficiency, and scalability of genetic screening approaches. In this review, we discuss the genetic screens performed in kinetoplastid parasites to date, emphasizing their application to both coding and noncoding regions of the genome. Furthermore, we explore how integrating image-based and single-cell sequencing technologies with genetic screens holds the potential to deliver unprecedented insights into cellular function and regulatory mechanisms.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingKinetoplastidaCRISPR-Cas SystemsGenome, ProtozoanGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID40530689
PMCPMC12203798

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.