ArticleClinical obesity2025
A cross-sectional analysis of emotional and binge eating in UK adults enrolled on the NHS low-calorie diet pilot for type 2 diabetes.
Article in Clinical obesity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents data gathered as part of the Re:Mission evaluation of the NHS low-calorie diet programme pilot for type 2 diabetes, to address two research questions: (1) What is the presence and severity of emotional and binge eating within this population? (2) Are demographic and health factors associated with the presence of binge eating or the severity of emotional eating? An online survey gathered data from n = 580 individuals who were enrolled on the programme but had not yet begun total diet replacement. The survey assessed emotional eating (TFEQ-R21), potential binge eating disorder diagnosis (BEDS-7), wellbeing (Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale), quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), frequency of weight cycling and demographic factors (collected via NHS England programme monitoring). Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were used to address the research questions. The mean emotional eating score from the TFEQ-R21 was 2.58 (0.96), and the presence of a potential binge eating disorder diagnosis was demonstrated in 26.0% of the sample. Regression analyses suggested that being female and engaging in more frequent weight cycling were associated with higher emotional eating and a greater likelihood of binge eating. Lower wellbeing and lower quality of life were associated with emotional and binge eating, respectively. Rates of emotional and binge eating in the NHS low-calorie diet pilot sample are higher than in the general public and in other similar samples. Consideration should be given to screening for emotional and disordered eating and for additional tailored support and monitoring for such individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.