Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40531908›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Short tandem repeat variants are possibly associated with RNA secondary structure and gene expression.

Nick Kinney, Dikshya Pathak, Emma Evans, Paola Arias

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nick KinneySweet Briar College, Sweet Briar, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4563-1813
Dikshya PathakSweet Briar College, Sweet Briar, Virginia, United States of America.
Emma EvansSweet Briar College, Sweet Briar, Virginia, United States of America.
Paola AriasSweet Briar College, Sweet Briar, Virginia, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Short tandem repeats (STRs) are abundant in the human genome with approximately 300,000 embedded in gene introns, exons, and untranslated regions. High penetrance STR variants cause human diseases such as Myotonic dystrophy, Baratela-Scott syndrome, and various ataxias. The possibility that STRs contribute to polygenic disease is supported by recent high-powered datasets that link STRs to more subtle effects on gene expression. Indeed, STR variants can induce Z-DNA and H-DNA folding; alter nucleosome positioning; and change the spacing of DNA binding sites. On the other hand, little is known about how STR variants affect RNA secondary structure and accessibility. These factors could affect rates of splicing, nuclear export, and translation. We hypothesize that effects on RNA structure can be predicted using computational tools and associated with gene expression using DNA and RNA sequencing data. We test this hypothesis using data from the 1000 Genomes Project and ViennaRNA. We identify 17,255 transcribed STRs that affect RNA folding (fSTRs); 356 are possibly associated with gene expression. We characterize fSTRs by repeat motif, length, and gene level annotation. Transcribed fSTR variants tend to affect RNA multiloops and external loops. Effects on RNA accessibility depends on the repeat motif: a surprising result that is checked against simulation. These results shed light on how transcribed STRs affect RNA structure and pave the way for experimental validation.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionGene Expression RegulationMicrosatellite RepeatsNucleic Acid ConformationRNAGenome, HumanHumansRNA FoldingRNA

Identifiers

PMID40531908
PMCPMC12176206

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.