ArticlePloS one2025
Covid-19 in hospitals: Studying influencing factors through agent-based modelling.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hospitals are highly dynamic environments where Covid-19 is highly transmissible if effective measures are not taken. General preventive policies are not necessarily effective; however, agent-based modelling can offer a way to tailor policies in such specific settings. In this paper, we develop an agent-based model to simulate a hospital as a multi-agent system and examine the influence of well-established Covid-19 factors on transmission, based on the Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Recovered epidemic model. These factors include the mask efficacy, the mask-wearing percentage, the vaccination percentage, the room ventilation, the distancing rule, and the screening policy. This study, conducted in 2023, simulates agent interactions in a hospital setting using Python. We apply different parametrisations and employ a local sensitivity analysis to isolate the effect of each factor on transmission. We perform statistical analysis using independent two-sample t-tests, with a significance threshold of p<0.05. When worn by the entire population, N95 masks effectively mitigate transmission. They are more effective than surgical masks and substantially more effective than not wearing masks. Surgical masks, especially when worn by all individuals, also have a significant impact. Vaccination is highly effective, particularly when the entire population is vaccinated, and becomes critical when mask protection is weaker. Ventilation and distancing show minimal impact when N95 masks are used entirely within the hospital; alternatively, their effect is noteworthy but not highly decisive. Finally, the screening policy substantially affects transmission when a high percentage of entrants are tested, especially when surgical masks or no masks are worn. The findings highlight the need for prioritising mask-wearing and vaccination compliance, combined with a comprehensive screening policy. The model is highly parameterisable and can be adjusted to simulate other hospital settings or other infectious diseases, serving as a decision-making tool. Future studies could explore the combined effects of multiple interventions and validate the model with empirical data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.