Trial reportPloS one2025
Group antenatal care positively transforms the care experience: Results of an effectiveness trial in Malawi.
Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03673709 (Group Antenatal Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Group Antenatal Care: Effectiveness for Maternal/Infant and HIV Prevention Outcomes and Contextual Factors Linked to Implementation Success in Malawi
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The challenge of adopting the health assessment when implementing antenatal and postnatal Group Care: identifying and understanding cross-country modifications and corresponding strategies to enable its adoption.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Utilization, satisfaction, and perceived maternal health benefits of group antenatal care in Karu LGA, North Central, Nigeria.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe developed and tested a Centering-based group antenatal (ANC) model in Malawi, integrating health promotion for HIV prevention and mental health. We present effectiveness data and examine congruence with only the Group ANC theory of change model, which identifies key processes as supportive relationships, empowered partners in learning and care, and meaningful services, leading to better ANC experiences and outcomes.
methodsWe conducted a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial at seven clinics in Blantyre District, Malawi, comparing outcomes for 1887 pregnant women randomly assigned to Group ANC or Individual ANC. Group effects on outcomes were summarized and evaluated using t-tests, Mann-Whitney, or Chi-squared tests. Adjusted for seven individual and two clinic-level baseline covariates, point estimates are reported for continuous outcomes using multivariable linear regression models. Adjusted for the same covariates, odds ratios are reported for categorical outcomes using logistic regression models. All statistical tests were two-sided, controlling for a Type I error probability of 0.01 due to multiple testing.
findingsWomen in Group ANC had higher peer connectedness and pregnancy-related empowerment, recalled receiving more services, and discussed more health promotion topics. They experienced less wait time, greater satisfaction with care (Estimate = 1.21, 99% CI = 0.07, 2.35), and had a higher mean number of ANC contacts (Estimate = 0.74, 99% CI = 0.50, 0.98). Most women preferred Group ANC for a future pregnancy (81% in Individual ANC; 95% in Group ANC). Women in Group ANC had more diverse diets (Estimate = 0.35, 99% CI = 0.17, 0.53), were better prepared for birth (Estimate 0.32, 99% CI = 0.16, 0.48), more likely to use condoms consistently (OR= 1.07, 99% CI = 1.00, 1.14) and communicated more with partners. They reported less mental distress in late pregnancy (Estimate = -0.61, 99% CI = -1.20, -0.02). Exclusive breastfeeding, partner HIV testing and disclosure, facility-based delivery, postnatal care attendance, postpartum family planning, and low birth weight did not differ by ANC type.
conclusionsThis effectiveness study of Malawi Group ANC, the first trial with individual randomization in a low-income country, maps outcomes to the theory of change, enhancing our understanding of Group ANC's diverse positive impacts. The integration of typically neglected health promotion topics into the model highlights its flexibility to address changing local and global needs. Based on study results, the Malawi Ministry of Health is introducing Group ANC at district-level trainings and exploring the logistics for nationwide adoption. With momentum and political will, better care and a positive healthcare experience can be achieved for women, infants, and families in Malawi and globally.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03673709.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.