ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2025
Glycemic control and asymptomatic carotid plaque and carotid intima-media thickness.
Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a machine learning-based predictive model for carotid plaque in type 2 diabetes.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe effects of different glucose metabolic states and diabetes-controlled status on asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis has not been well investigated. Herein, we aimed to investigate the association of different diabetes status with asymptomatic carotid plaques and carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT). RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methods4752 participants aged over 40 years, free of stroke or myocardial infarction, from the China National Stroke Screen Survey programme were enrolled. Carotid plaque and CIMT were assessed using duplex ultrasonography. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between diabetes status and the presence of asymptomatic carotid plaques or abnormal CIMT.
resultsA total of 1977 (41.6%) subjects had carotid plaques and 804 (16.9%) had abnormal CIMT. In multivariate analyses, compared with normoglycemia, individuals with pre-diabetes showed significantly higher odds of asymptomatic carotid plaques (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.45) and patients with diabetes also had higher odds (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.41 to 1.92). Diabetes (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.50 to 2.14) was associated with vulnerable plaques, while pre-diabetes was not (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.43). Poorly controlled diabetes (HbA1c ≥7.5%) had higher odds of carotid plaques (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.44), especially of vulnerable plaques (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.55 to 2.67). No significant association was found between diabetes and abnormal CIMT.
conclusionsPre-diabetes and diabetes, especially poorly controlled diabetes, were associated with increased odds of asymptomatic carotid plaques. Implementing the most effective strategies to achieve optimal glycemic control is crucial for the prevention and management of atherosclerosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.