ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2025
Applications of artificial intelligence in drug discovery for neurological diseases.
Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-based biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of neurological conditions: a narrative review.Molecular brain · 2026Review
- MegaEye: Applying multiple machine learning approaches to identify oral compounds with ocular bioactivity.Artificial intelligence in the life sciences · 2025Article
- Design and Development of Sulfonamide-Chalcones as Antiepileptic Candidates: Computational and Zebrafish-Based Validation Approaches.ACS omega · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurological disease encompasses over 1000 disorders, exacts a massive human health and financial toll as well as being a story of extremes. At one end are diseases that are complex and heterogeneous affecting millions, while at the other there are monogenic and rare diseases, with a handful of individuals. What are absent are drugs that can treat or cure the disease. Discovering these is challenging, held back by extreme costs to develop them or in some cases by the limited understanding of the diseases. After decades of drug discovery research there is now considerable data available which can be used to help develop novel compounds more strategically. This includes high throughput screening data with targets, crystal structures of proteins implicated in neurological diseases and adjacent data such as properties of molecules like blood brain barrier permeability as well as an array of in vitro and in vivo toxicity endpoints valuable for any drug targeting the central nervous system. While computational tools have been developing and applied to neurological diseases for decades, we are now in the age of machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI). This promises the potential to expedite the identification and discovery of new molecules. Whether by using individual computational techniques or complex end-to-end approaches, scientists can narrow the molecules they make and test as well as study more targets or diseases which might have been out of reach previously. This review highlights the many different applications of AI potentially enabling new discoveries and treatments for neurological diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.