Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40533512›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2025

An episodic burst of massive genomic rearrangements and the origin of non-marine annelids.

Carlos Vargas-Chávez, Lisandra Benítez-Álvarez, Gemma I Martínez-Redondo, Lucía Álvarez-González, Judit Salces-Ortiz, Klara Eleftheriadi, Nuria Escudero, Nadège Guiglielmoni, Jean-François Flot, Marta Novo and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The genome sequence of the freshwater leech,Wellcome open research · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Carlos Vargas-ChávezMetazoa Phylogenomics and Genome Evolution Lab, Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-UPF), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3635-1411
Lisandra Benítez-ÁlvarezMetazoa Phylogenomics and Genome Evolution Lab, Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-UPF), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0473-4525
Gemma I Martínez-RedondoMetazoa Phylogenomics and Genome Evolution Lab, Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-UPF), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5633-8690
Lucía Álvarez-GonzálezDepartament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8154-8614
Judit Salces-OrtizMetazoa Phylogenomics and Genome Evolution Lab, Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-UPF), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3572-4020
Klara EleftheriadiMetazoa Phylogenomics and Genome Evolution Lab, Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-UPF), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9111-1616
Nuria EscuderoMetazoa Phylogenomics and Genome Evolution Lab, Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-UPF), Barcelona, Spain.
Nadège GuiglielmoniUniversität zu Köln, Institut für Zoologie, Cologne, Germany.
Jean-François FlotService Evolution Biologique et Ecologie, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4091-7916
Marta NovoDepartment of Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolution, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7902-3819
Aurora Ruiz-HerreraDepartament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3868-6151
Aoife McLysaghtDepartment of Genetics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Rosa FernándezMetazoa Phylogenomics and Genome Evolution Lab, Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-UPF), Barcelona, Spain. rosa.fernandez@ibe.upf-csic.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4719-6640

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 948281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genomic basis of cladogenesis and adaptive evolutionary change has intrigued biologists for decades. Here we show that the tectonics of genome evolution in clitellates, a clade composed of most freshwater and all terrestrial species of the phylum Annelida, is characterized by extensive genome-wide scrambling that resulted in a massive loss of macrosynteny between marine annelids and clitellates. These massive rearrangements included the formation of putative neocentromeres with newly acquired transposable elements and preceded a further period of genome-wide reshaping events, potentially triggered by the loss of genes involved in genome stability and homoeostasis of cell division. Notably, whereas these rearrangements broke short-range interactions observed between Hox genes in marine annelids, they were reformed as long-range interactions in clitellates. Our findings reveal extensive genomic reshaping in clitellates at both the linear (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) levels, suggesting that unlike in other animal lineages where synteny conservation constrains structural evolution, clitellates exhibit a remarkable tolerance for chromosomal rearrangements. Our study thus suggests that the genomic landscape of Clitellata resulted from a rare burst of genomic changes that ended a long period of stability that persists across large phylogenetic distances.

Indexed as

AnnelidaBiological EvolutionEvolution, MolecularGene RearrangementGenomeAnimalsPhylogenySynteny

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.