ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2025
Machine learning-based stratification of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes progression.
Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Saudi Clinical Practice Guidelines for management of diabetic kidney disease in adults.Saudi medical journal · 2025Guideline
- Enhancing Glomerular Hematuria Identification in Automated Urinalysis Using a Light Gradient Boosting Machine-Based Model: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2026Article
- Nanostructured electrode materials and flexible-substrate engineering for wearable multi-analyte biosensors in diabetes monitoring and personalized care: a comprehensive review.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Review
- Stratification of Pro-Atherogenic Phenotypes in Prediabetes Using Machine Learning.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Identification of NFKB1, miR-342-5p, -5192, and - 15b as diagnostic biomarkers for periodontitis in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional and experimental study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiabetes mellitus, a global health concern with severe complications, demands early detection and precise staging for effective management. Machine learning approaches, combined with bioinformatics, offer promising avenues for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and identifying key biomarkers.
methodsThis study employed a multi-class classification framework to classify patients across four health states: healthy, prediabetes, type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) without complications, and T2DM with complications. Three models were developed using molecular markers, biochemical markers, and a combined model of both. Five machine learning classifiers were applied: Random Forest (RF), Extra Tree Classifier, Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, Naïve Bayes, and Light Gradient Boosting Machine. To improve the robustness and precision of the classification, Recursive Feature Elimination with Cross-Validation (RFECV) and a fivefold cross-validation were used. The multi-class classification approach enabled effective discrimination between the four diabetes stages.
resultsThe top contributing features identified for the combined model through RFECV included three molecular markers-miR342, NFKB1, and miR636-and two biochemical markers the albumin-to-creatinine ratio and HDLc, indicating their strong association with diabetes progression. The Extra Trees Classifier achieved the highest performance across all models, with an AUC value of 0.9985 (95% CI: [0.994-1.000]). This classifier outperformed other models, demonstrating its robustness and applicability for precise diabetes staging.
conclusionThese findings underscore the value of integrating machine learning with molecular and biochemical markers for the accurate classification of diabetes stages, supporting a potential shift toward more personalized diabetes management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.