Evidence mapPaperPMID 40533788Full record

ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2025

Machine learning-based stratification of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes progression.

Marwa Matboli, Abdelrahman Khaled, Manar Fouad Ahmed, Manar Yehia Ahmed, Radwa Khaled, Gena M Elmakromy, Amani Mohamed Abdel Ghani, Marwa M El-Shafei, Marwa Ramadan M Abdelhalim, Asmaa Mohamed Abd El Gwad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marwa MatboliDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 11566, Egypt. DrMarwa_Matboly@med.asu.edu.eg.
Abdelrahman KhaledBioinformatics Group, Center of Informatics Sciences (CIS), School of Information Technology and Computer Sciences, Nile University, Giza, Egypt.
Manar Fouad AhmedDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 11566, Egypt.
Manar Yehia AhmedDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 11566, Egypt.
Radwa KhaledBiotechnology Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Cairo, 11566, Egypt.
Gena M ElmakromyEndocrinology & Diabetes Mellitus Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Badr University in Cairo, Badr, Egypt.
Amani Mohamed Abdel GhaniClinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 11566, Egypt.
Marwa M El-ShafeiPathology Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt.
Marwa Ramadan M AbdelhalimClinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 11566, Egypt.
Asmaa Mohamed Abd El GwadDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 11566, Egypt.

Funding

Academy of Scientific Research and Technology, Egypt, JESOR call 2019 ID 5090. JESOR call 2019 ID 5090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes mellitus, a global health concern with severe complications, demands early detection and precise staging for effective management. Machine learning approaches, combined with bioinformatics, offer promising avenues for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and identifying key biomarkers.

methodsThis study employed a multi-class classification framework to classify patients across four health states: healthy, prediabetes, type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) without complications, and T2DM with complications. Three models were developed using molecular markers, biochemical markers, and a combined model of both. Five machine learning classifiers were applied: Random Forest (RF), Extra Tree Classifier, Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, Naïve Bayes, and Light Gradient Boosting Machine. To improve the robustness and precision of the classification, Recursive Feature Elimination with Cross-Validation (RFECV) and a fivefold cross-validation were used. The multi-class classification approach enabled effective discrimination between the four diabetes stages.

resultsThe top contributing features identified for the combined model through RFECV included three molecular markers-miR342, NFKB1, and miR636-and two biochemical markers the albumin-to-creatinine ratio and HDLc, indicating their strong association with diabetes progression. The Extra Trees Classifier achieved the highest performance across all models, with an AUC value of 0.9985 (95% CI: [0.994-1.000]). This classifier outperformed other models, demonstrating its robustness and applicability for precise diabetes staging.

conclusionThese findings underscore the value of integrating machine learning with molecular and biochemical markers for the accurate classification of diabetes stages, supporting a potential shift toward more personalized diabetes management.

Indexed as

Diabetes mellitusExtra tree classifierMachine learningRNAT2DM

Identifiers

PMID40533788
PMCPMC12175357

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.