ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2025
Association between abdominal fat distribution and urinary albumin/creatinine ratio in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the relationship between abdominal fat distribution (AFD) and urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) in Chinese adults.
methods823 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM) were selected. Abdominal visceral fat area (VFA) and subcutaneous fat area (SFA) were measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Patients were divided into four groups: low VFA /low SFA, low VFA /high SFA, high VFA /low SFA, and high VFA /high SFA based on the median values (low: < median, high: ≥median).
resultsIn the multifactor analysis after adjusting for relevant factors, VFA, waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), waist-hip ratio (WHR), and waist circumference (WC) showed significant positive correlations with UACR, while SFA and BMI did not. AFD combinations were independent predictors of UACR. The risk of UACR30-300 mg/g was highest in the high VFA/low SFA group (OR = 3.12), and for UACR > 300 mg/g, it was highest in the high VFA/high SFA group (OR = 24.69). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curvefor VFA prediction of UACR ≥ 30 mg/g was 0.69, significantly greater than that for WHtR, WHR, and WC. Optimal cut-off values were 98.8 cm² for VFA. When analyzed by gender, the optimal cut-off values for VFA were 98.8 cm² for males and 102.3 cm² for females.
conclusionCentral obesity indicators (VFA, WHtR, WHR, WC) were associated with UACR. VFA was the strongest predictor for UACR ≥ 30 mg/g.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.