ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2025
Effectiveness of a formulary system on prophylactic oral proton pump inhibitors for drug-induced peptic ulcer in a Japanese tertiary hospital: an interrupted time series analysis.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of a local formulary on prescribing patterns and pharmaceutical expenditure: an observational study in Japan.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPharmacy formulary systems have been established recently in various fields of pharmacotherapies. We evaluated the effectiveness of pharmacy formulary interventions on proton pump inhibitors (PPI) used to prevent drug-induced peptic ulcers in a Japanese tertiary hospital.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted in Kurashiki Central Hospital. A pharmacy formulary system of PPIs was implemented on October 1, 2020. Between April 2020 and March 2021, six months before and after the implementation date of the formulary system, inpatients aged ≥ 18 years were included if they newly received drugs (low-dose aspirin, anti-platelets, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) recommended for prophylactic PPI use for peptic ulcers within seven days from hospital admission. Eligible patients were divided into two groups based on the implementation date, and changes in PPI prescription patterns were evaluated by interrupted time series analysis, along with the risk of drug-induced peptic ulcers and drug costs.
resultsIn total, 2,449 inpatients were included. The median age of the pre- and post-formulary group was 60 and 58 years, respectively. The proportion of the targeted PPI prescription increased by 8.75% (95% confidence interval (CI); 0.12, 17.38) in level change, without increased risk of drug-induced peptic ulcers (risk difference -0.41%, 95% CI; -1.38, 0.55). The distribution of medication days in the two groups was similar, and $1,000 per 90 patient days was saved on drug costs.
conclusionThe formulary system on oral PPIs in a Japanese tertiary hospital contributed to a positive level change in the prescription patterns, without increased risk of drug-induced peptic ulcers. Although slight, the drug costs were saved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.