ArticlePhysical review. E2025
Genetic designs for stochastic and probabilistic biocomputing.
Article in Physical review. E, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the computing power of microbes that shapes the environment.Current opinion in microbiology · 2026Review
- Intracellularly coupled oscillators for synthetic biology.Nature communications · 2025Review
- Why cellular computations challenge our design principles.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The programming of computations in living cells is achieved by manipulating information flows within genetic networks. Typically, gene expression is discretized into high and low levels, representing 0 and 1 logic values to encode a single bit of information. However, molecular signaling and computation in living systems operate dynamically, stochastically, and continuously, challenging this binary paradigm. While stochastic and probabilistic models of computation address these complexities, there is a lack of work unifying these concepts to implement computations tailored to these features of living matter. Here we design genetic networks for stochastic and probabilistic computing, developing the underlying theory. Moving beyond the digital framework, we propose random pulses and probabilistic-bits (p-bits) as better candidates for encoding and processing information genetic networks. Encoding information through the frequency of expression burst frequency offers robustness to noise, while p-bits enable unique circuit designs with features like invertibility. We illustrate these advantages by designing circuits and providing mathematical models and simulations to demonstrate their functionality. Our approach to stochastic and probabilistic computing not only advances our understanding of information processing in biological systems but also opens new possibilities for designing genetic circuits with enhanced capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.