Trial reportDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2025
Impact of automated insulin delivery on subjective and objective sleep in children and young adults with very high HbA1c: Sleep outcomes from the CO-PILOT randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of automated insulin delivery on subjective and objective sleep in children and young adults with very high HbA1c: Sleep outcomes from the CO-PILOT randomised controlled trial.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo assess how automated insulin delivery (AID) impacts sleep in young people with type 1 diabetes and suboptimal glycaemia (HbA1c ≥ 69 mmol/mol).
methodsWe conducted a randomised controlled trial comparing AID to usual care in 80 participants (aged 7-25 years) over 13 weeks. Sleep was a secondary outcome assessed at baseline and 13 weeks using questionnaires (subjective) and accelerometry (objective).
resultsAll participants completed the trial; 64 provided subjective and 40 provided objective sleep data. Participants reported poor subjective sleep quality alongside high levels of sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairment at both timepoints. At 13 weeks, sleep-related impairment improved more in the intervention group than in controls (MD = -4.7; 95% CI = -8.7, -0.8; p = 0.02), with no between-group differences in other subjective measures. Accelerometry data showed the intervention group spent 21 more minutes awake after sleep onset (WASO) (MD = 21; 95% CI = 1, 41; p = 0.04) and experienced a 4 percentage point decline in sleep efficiency (MD = -4.2; 95% CI = -8.0, -0.3; p = 0.03), compared to controls after 13 weeks. These results paralleled substantial improvements in HbA1c for intervention participants compared to controls (MD = -34 mmol/mol; 95% CI = -43, -25; p-value <0.001).
conclusionAlthough AID improved some subjective sleep aspects, sleep efficiency reduced and WASO increased. The relationship between glycaemia and sleep remains unclear, suggesting that effective sleep improvement in young people with T1D may require multifactorial approaches extending beyond improving glycaemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.