ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Machine learning-based prediction of 6-month functional recovery in hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage: insights from XGBoost and SHAP analysis.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable XGBoost model and nomogram for risk factor identification and risk prediction in cerebral small vessel disease: a machine learning-based retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Article
- Development and validation of a predictive model for postoperative functional recovery in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The poor prognosis of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage (HICH) remains high. The period of 3-6 months after onset is the most rapid phase of neurological recovery in hemorrhagic stroke patients. Accurate early prediction of 6-month functional outcomes is critical for optimizing therapeutic strategies. This study compared the predictive efficacy of multiple machine learning models to identify the optimal model for forecasting long-term prognosis in HICH patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from 807 HICH patients admitted to Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital's Neurosurgery Department between June 2020 and June 2024. After data preprocessing, data from June 2020 to December 2023 ( Results: The 6-month poor prognosis rate among 807 HICH patients was 27.51%. The XGBoost model exhibited optimal performance in the training set (AUC = 0.921, 95% CI: 0.896-0.944) and demonstrated stability in the external validation set (AUC = 0.813, 95% CI: 0.728-0.899). DCA analysis showed that the XGBoost model provided higher net benefit than other models across threshold probabilities of 0%-20% and 56%-100%. SHAP analysis identified hematoma volume as the most critical predictor, with secondary contributions from Glasgow coma score, white blood cell count, age, serum albumin, and systolic blood pressure, among others. Conclusion: XGBoost models demonstrate powerful accuracy in long-term prognosis prediction of HICH patients. The SHAP framework quantifies the specific contributions of key pathophysiological indicators to individual patient model predictions, enabling individualized risk stratification and strategic allocation of medical resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.