Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40534747›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2025

A review about muscle focal vibration contribution on spasticity recovery.

Luigi Fattorini, Vito Enrico Pettorossi, Enrico Marchetti, Angelo Rodio, Guido Maria Filippi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luigi FattoriniDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Vito Enrico PettorossiDepartment of Human Physiology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Enrico MarchettiNational Institute for Insurance Against Accidents at Work (INAIL), Rome, Italy.
Angelo RodioDepartment of Human, Social, and Health Sciences, University of Cassino, Cassino, Italy.
Guido Maria FilippiDepartment of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This review analyses the benefits of focal muscle vibration (FV) in the treatment of spasticity enhancing current understanding and promoting sustained improvements in motor function. Findings could support the selection of optimal FV protocols, guide future research, and provide insights into the mechanisms by which FV may improve motor function in individuals with spasticity. Methods: A systematic search was conducted using the online databases PubMed, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library. Including criteria: (a) participants presented with chronic spasticity; (b) the intervention involved the application of localized mechanical vibration; and (c) outcomes included neuromuscular functional parameters. Data extraction was performed independently by four reviewers, using a modified version of the 16-item Downs and Black checklist. Results: A total of 20 studies were selected, most of which investigated on spasticity following stroke, as well as in conditions such as cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, and Minamata syndrome. FV effects were assessed using several methodologies: functional scales, digital analysis and electrophysiological evaluations. After-effects were positive and significant in 19 studies, while one study found non-significant results. In three studies, follow-up durations ranged between 1 and 30 days, and exceeded 1 month in seven. When adequate tests were performed, improvements extended to untreated muscles and involved complex motor behaviors. Discussion: The after-effects of FV appear to be most relevant and long-lasting when a high-frequency (75-120 Hz), small-amplitude sinusoidal vibrations are repeatedly applied. The observed enduring improvements in complex motor behaviors suggest the involvement of sensory-motor mechanisms. These findings are discussed in the context of previous studies on FV.

Indexed as

hypertoniaproprioceptionrehabilitation protocolstimulus frequencytonic vibration reflex

Identifiers

PMID40534747
PMCPMC12173915

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.