Evidence mapPaperPMID 40534752Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2025

Social media use, cannabis attitudes, and cannabis use among adolescents: An observational study.

Erin A Vogel, Katelyn F Romm, Zachary B Massey, Amy M Cohn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erin A VogelTSET Health Promotion Research Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, 655 Research Parkway, Suite 400, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
Katelyn F RommTSET Health Promotion Research Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, 655 Research Parkway, Suite 400, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
Zachary B MasseyTSET Health Promotion Research Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, 655 Research Parkway, Suite 400, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
Amy M CohnTSET Health Promotion Research Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, 655 Research Parkway, Suite 400, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.

Funding

Tissue Pathology and Biospecimen Shared ResourceP30CA225520 · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · 2025 to 2025
$2.2M
Developing and Testing Warning Labels for Retail Cannabis ProductsK01DA057395 · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · 2025 to 2025
$191k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA225520NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA057395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Adolescents with frequent (versus infrequent) social media use display higher cannabis use prevalence. This study examined associations of social media use frequency with pro-cannabis attitudes, an actionable intervention target. Methods: Youth aged 13-17 in Oklahoma, United States completed an online, cross-sectional survey (March-October 2023) measuring social media use frequency (0-1.5 vs. 1.5+ hours/day), pro-cannabis attitudes (e.g., "cannabis is an effective treatment for mental health problems"), past-month cannabis use (yes/no), and individual characteristics (e.g., age, tobacco use). Regression models tested associations of social media use frequency with pro-cannabis attitudes, pro-cannabis attitudes with past-month cannabis use, and social media use frequency with past-month cannabis use. Results: The sample ( Conclusions: Adolescents with frequent social media use may develop pro-cannabis attitudes, which may be associated with future cannabis use. Prevention messaging could target attitudes.

Indexed as

AdolescentAttitudescannabisMarijuanaSocial media

Identifiers

PMID40534752
PMCPMC12174598

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.